To Be or Not To Be ...
...involved in controversy, that is. Our Sunday School and learning center was embroiled in some controversy recently and my missus feels that we (meaning my family and I) should or rather shouldn't be involved in the controversy.
What pray tell is the controversy, you ask? Well, it started when a new center for the local Buddhist community was planned for nearby and the then-ex-co of my kids' Sunday school-n-center was asked to assist in fund-raising.
SO...where's the controversy? The controversy is whether the present center (a separate entity from the new center) should continue to exist along side the new one or not. I don't see any problems other than the potential financial strain on the local community for funds.
I am sure that with proper planning and infusing our thoughts n actions with Compassion, we can raise funds without taxing the community. For example, the two centers can share the funds thus collected between them.
SO...where again is the controversy? It lies in the actions of the people. Some were in favor of closing the old (and an entirely different entity) and moving into the new. Why move? Better facilities, better environment, better prospects. Huh? Come again? Better prospects?
Ok...SO...besides better prospects (for whoever or whatever), where again is the controversy? It lies in the approach of the people. Things were rather calm and collected when the “move” was being discussed (without the knowledge of the parent body of the “old” center, why? I'm not privy to know. I suppose it's a need to know basis; I don't need to know and parent body also doesn't need to know...whatever you say,bro!)
Then all Samsara broke loose when the parent body found out about the decision to close down n move (finally someone there learned to read their emails!) and gave instructions to keep the center open. Well and fine, so this means someone need to stay back to run things. It seems everyone involved with the move had expected a care-taker committee from the parent body to runs things but NO! The principal of the Sunday School decided to stay back and so did the Chairman of the center!...Good Heavens! That is just not on! Something must be done!
Something indeed was done. A massive lobbying effort the likes of the Ijok by-election was carried out, causing much confusion where none was need. Once-peaceful families were torn asunder by the 'ultimatum' decision of to stay or not to stay with the old center! I heard that personal attacks were even brought out as part of the “arsenal”. Maybe they wanted it to become an “arse-on-a-nail” experience for someone.
Here lies the controversy...can families be apart one day a week and still remain a family? A resounding YES, of course!!! After all, families are being forced apart by choice daily at least 5 days of the week! The kids go to school, the parents to the office. BUT we're together at the end of the day. Most Saturdays are together-days for many families so being apart for the spiritual well-being of the family on Sundays shouldn't be an issue at all. But no! Mums & kids MUST follow dad or dads MUST follow mums & kids. Some kids say their friends are there so they MUST go.
Can't mums & dads take turns attending the kids? Doesn't mums n dads have the freedom to decide where they want to be this week or the next? Why must everyone be at one place and one place only and not 'either...or'? I heard some mums decided 'neither...nor' since they can't have 'either...or'.
I wonder why parents haven't taught their kids self-reliance, thinking for themselves and not to 'follow the crowd'. Maybe they did and maybe the kids thought it'd be cool to hang out with friends and “Dharma-shmarma! Hang the teachers! I've got my friends here n we're going to gossip to our hearts' content!”
Being a member of one center does not exact such dedication that one will attend activities in another center only upon-threat-of-death! This 'dedication', if I can use the term, is frivolous especially in the light that many involved in the 'Move' decision had spent many hours and much energy n effort in establishing the 'old' center.
By being so strongly for the closure of the 'old' center really begs this question: what's so greatly prized at the new center that the efforts and recognition of so many contributors in building and growing the old center is to be cast aside so easily?
Why wasn't the lack (which was mentioned as reason for the move) at the old place acted upon in the past when it became known? Was knowledge of the lack swept under some proverbial carpet?
Why the very strong reaction against the decision by some to stay? Why the intense lobbying? Why the intense hob-nobbing? Why indeed!
As a rather active (then)non-member, I was perplexed by this and still am. Which is why I decided to be more active in the decision-making process. I cannot stand idly by and see my children's only doorway to the Buddha-Dhamma slammed shut by the decisions of a few made (apparently) for the many. This was and is the only place that offers focused activities-based Dhamma education and I have seen what activity-based education can do.
I have experienced focused Dhamma education and training. It was literally an eye-opener. My Dharma “eye” opened a crack, enough for me to see past cultural influences and see the Dhamma underneath the various schools of Buddhism. It open enough for me to experience some minor mental calm arising from focused meditation. Book knowledge was transformed into personal experience.
These personal transformations changed my life and perspective enough for me to walk a different path from my brother and my parents' plans for my children.
I would like...no, want... others to be able to experience these transformations themselves; especially the children. The first school-going kids I met at a Buddhist center were so much different from the ones at the present Sunday school. Those kids had great self-discipline. The whole family took part in meditation retreats during school breaks. They are normal, regular kids keen on centering themselves but NOT spoilt, self-centered brats.
Chewing gum and SMS-ing during Puja and lessons? How self-centered can you get? If the kids are like this, how are the parents? These ore the future Buddhist community leaders? We are going to be in deep poo-doo if nothing is done to rehabilitate these children!
YES, that's right! Rehabilitate! Coz if they don't have the self-restraint to stop SMS-ing, chit-chat, chewing gum or even put their mobiles into silent mode during puja, lessons or talks/discussions, there's no stopping them! They are, in the future, going to repeat History again.
I ask again – why the intense effort to close the 'old' center? Why the intense lobbying? If there IS something of great prize there? IS it there for the community or is it personal? What IS there for the children? I know there are lots of rooms and facilities. Will the children be pushed aside for the adults? Can it be guaranteed that the children will not be cast aside for the adults?
Best of luck to the teachers and principal of the new center! The doors are always open, you only need to decide whether to step through or not.
Sukhi Hontu!
Kevin – 21 May 2007 - KL
ps. this is definitely worth more than two cents; at least one teh-tarik worth!